Activity for Monica
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #407 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #407 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Another post for testing Testing the KBD tag ctrl-X Yup, that's rendered in the preview. Let's see what happens on submit. Answer: not rendered. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #314 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Unicorns are the best! Will this community be for all unicorns, both goat-based and rainbow-colored horse-based? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #313 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
Unicorns are the best! We should totally have a community for unicorns! (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
@#10hi testing https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/619... and confirmed. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #146 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Draft meta post This is an in-progress draft meta post for when threaded comments are ready to deploy. From our earliest discussions of what the Codidact platform would be, we've known that we had to tackle comments. Comments are very important for giving feedback and asking for clarifications. Some other p... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #72 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
Feature request (not a blocker for release, but I think we'll want to add this): show (in the thread) who archived or deleted a thread to anyone who can see the thread in the first place. This is the same level of visibility as for deleted posts; I don't think that needs to be mod-only.
I'm not s... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
This is another test comment to see if it bumps the thread. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
How was I able to ping Moshi there, when Moshi is not the post author or a follower or commenter here? *Did* I ping Moshi?
(more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
This is a test of @#10 pings. Oh good I'm not getting "undefined" now. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #72 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
There's a deleted thread on your answer now (a deleted "Post Feedback", in addition to the undeleted one). Can you see it @#13? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
This is a test comment to see if it bumps the thread. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
Discovered while editing the previous comment: @-completion works for new comments but not for edits; I had to type the ping for @#10 by hand and don't know if it pinged.
(more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
(Can't create a new thread right now so putting this here.) What do you mean you can't see deleted threads even as a mod? I see [this](https://a.dev.codidact.org/uploads/5sXwcdBpcoy4CqhGhW5P2AQ9) on the question; don't you? @Moshi (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #72 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #86 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: test your comments here Rethinking flagging > needs author's attention > This question is off-topic or cannot be reasonably answered in its current form and needs revision by its author. > > This flag will be added as a comment to this post's feedback thread. Using this flag creates, or adds to, a thread named P... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #72 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
There was a Post Feedback thread, and now it's deleted. What will happen when I submit this flag? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
I wonder what happens if I delete "Post Feedback" and then flag as needing author attention... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #72 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
Confirmed; it's sorting by number of comments. I think *either* bumping (to the top) on a new comment *or* keeping the threads in order of creation (for those with a more positional memory) would be better than sorting the threads by length. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
Interesting. It said "1 comment" before, and then I added that, and it still said "1 comment". This should take it to 2, methinks. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
What emptiness stands before me? Let us see if populating this thread changes its position! (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
Oh, I thought it was sorted by recency. Time for more science. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
Got two inbox notifications. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
Commenting in another thread is emitting 500s; just that one or any? Let's find out. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
@#3 ping 2 - how many notifications? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
I left a long comment here about how posting that previous comment got me a 500, but I failed to save it and this time I got the 500 but no comment. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #64 |
@#3 ping 1 - how many notifications did you get? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
I created a new thread ("collapse preview") and saw it appear at the bottom of the list. I've noticed that in other cases new comments bumped a thread to the top, so I refreshed, thinking it was caching. No change. Then I added a comment to "abandoning comments", and that did bump. It looks like ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
This is just a stray comment so I can test something with thread bumping. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #72 |
I clicked on a thread that had one comment, read the comment, (pending a deploy would have seen confirmation that I'm seeing everything), and wanted to collapse it back down again to get it back out of my way. Could we have a "collapse" link for an expanded (in-page) thread? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #41 |
Are we checking for the thread by name, or does it have a special identity? (This is a flag.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #41 |
I created this thread manually, not via a flag, to see what happens when I then flag the post. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #68 |
Great, thanks! This is what we want. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #67 |
Oh, I see it in an incognito window now too. Maybe I missed it or maybe I need to blame caching. Never mind! (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #67 |
I did not get pinged by that comment. I assume the reason I can see the thread is that I'm a moderator. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #36 |
I'm not UserC, but I just was a few minutes ago and I didn't see a ping from here, @#7.
Also, accepting a ping auto-complete removes focus from the textbox, so I have to click back in to finish my comment. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #42 |
I did not get a notification for @Moshi's comment even though my name is highlighted there. Should I have? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #42 |
Huh. I can see a comment ("not very stealthy, evidently") but it's not attributed. And no timestamp.
This category is restricted to signed-in users. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #42 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #42 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Article | — |
Just how stealthy is this category, really? This is a post in a limited-access category. Can users who can't see the category see the post if they have the URL? Does it show up publicly on my profile? Let's find out. Result: 404 with the URL, not shown on the profile: screenshot, not logged in EDIT (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →