Communities

Codidact
Codidact
Code Golf Dev
Code Golf Dev
Judaism Dev
Judaism Dev
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Formatting sandbox

Parent

Formatting sandbox

+3
−0

Does all our special formatting work as expected? Math, code, footnotes, etc? Let's find out.

History

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

Copied from https://math.codidact.com/posts/286292, 'cause that's way easier than working out complicated wide mathjax on my own...

N.B.: the image in this post is a link to somewhere else; it wasn't uploaded here.


Introduction:

For some background information on the Dottie Number D,

Cross posted from:

Why does the Dottie Number equal a median of a Beta distribution?

since the original question is unanswered.

Some definitions:

The “solution” to Kepler’s equation is Kepler E:

$$M=E-e\sin(E)\iff x=y-a\sin(y)\implies y=\text E(a,x)$$

and Inverse Beta Regularized function $\text I^{-1}_z(a,b)$, Beta Regularized function $\text I_z(a,b)$, and the Incomplete Beta function $\text B_z(a,b)$:

$$\text B_z(a,b)=\int_0^z t^{a-1} (1-t)^{b-1}dt, \text I_z(a,b)=\frac{\int_0^z t^{a-1} (1-t)^{b-1}dt}{\int_0^1 t^{a-1} (1-t)^{b-1}dt } =\frac{\text B_z(a,b)}{\text B(a,b)}$$$$\text I_y(a,b)=z\implies y=\text I^{-1}_{0\le z\le 1}(a\ge 0,b\ge0)=\text I^{-1}_z(a,b)$$

where the restrictions on $z,a,b$ help find the quantile of a Beta type Distribution. The goal is to notice that:

$$\text B_z\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)=\int_0^z \sqrt{\frac 1x-1}dx=\sqrt{x-x^2}+\sin^{-1}\sqrt x\implies \text B_{\sin^2(z)}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)\mathop=^{0\le z\le 1}z+\sin(z)\cos(z)=z+\frac12 \sin(2z)$$

and $$z+\frac12 \sin(2z)=y\mathop=^{x=2z} \frac x2+\frac 12 \sin(x)=y\implies x-(-\sin(x))=2y\implies x=\text E(-1,2y)\implies z=\frac {\text E(-1,2y)}2$$

while the dottie number:

$$x=\text D:x-\cos(x)=0\mathop\implies^{x=\frac \pi2-z}\frac \pi2-z-\cos\left(\frac\pi2-z\right)=\frac\pi2-z-\sin(z)=0\implies \frac \pi2=z-(-\sin(z))\implies z=\text E\left(-1,\frac\pi2\right)=\frac\pi 2-x\implies \frac\pi2-\text E\left(-1,\frac\pi2\right) =x$$

However if $$\text B_{\sin^2(z)}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)=z+\frac12 \sin(2z)=\text B\left(\frac12,\frac32\right) \text I_{\sin^2(z)}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)=\frac \pi2 \text I_{\sin^2(z)}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)=y $$

$$\implies \sin^2(z)=\text I^{-1}_{\frac{2y}\pi}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)$$$$\mathop\implies^{0\le z\le\frac \pi 2} \sin^{-1}\sqrt{\text I^{-1}_{\frac{2y}\pi}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)}=z$$

Therefore:

$$\text E(-1,x)=2\sin^{-1}\sqrt{\text I^{-1}_{\frac x\pi}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)}$$

$$=\text{hav}^{-1}\left(\text I^{-1}_{\frac x\pi}\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)\right)\,\implies \text I^{-1}_x\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)= \sin^2\left(\frac{\text E(-1,\pi x)}2\right)=\text {hav}(\text E(-1,x))$$

where appears the Half Versed Sine and Inverse Half Versed Sine

Therefore:

$$\text D= \frac\pi2-\text E\left(-1,\frac\pi2\right) =\frac \pi2-2\sin^{-1}\sqrt{\text I^{-1}_\frac12\left(\frac 12,\frac 32\right)}$$$$=\sin^{-1}\left(1-2 \text I^{-1}_\frac12\left(\frac 12,\frac 32\right)\right) $$

which is the Inverse Half Covered Sine. Using $\text D=\cos^{-1}(\text D)$ we get a closed form with $0$ error and another closed form:

The Main Result: $$\text{Dottie Number}=\text D=\text{hacoversin}^{-1}\ \text I^{-1}_\frac12\left(\frac 12,\frac 32\right)$$

$$=\sqrt{1-\left(2\text I^{-1}_\frac12\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)-1\right)^2}$$

where $\sqrt{\text{quantile}(1-\text{quantile})}$ is not quite a statistical formula and where the arcsin formula works with an error of $10^{-179}$. Also, $\text I^{-1}_\frac12(a,b)$ finds the median of a Beta Distribution with $a,b$ as shape parameters.

The Question:

Even though the calculations are an explanation,

what is the intuition behind the Dottie number being the inverse half covered sine of the median of a Beta distribution with half integer shape parameters?

Phrased differently, why is the dottie number the positive square root of $1-(2x-1)^2$ where $x$ is the median of a Beta distribution with half integer shape parameters?

Please correct me and give me feedback!

Side Note $1$:

Therefore we have a closed form for a Inverse Beta Regularized function special case:

Median of $\frac 2\pi \sqrt{\frac 1x-1}$:

enter image description here

where the median is the point such that half of the area of a curve is the red region and the other half is the blue region. The $\color{red}{\text {red}}$ horizontal line is the median:

$$\text{median}=\text I^{-1}_\frac12\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)$$$$=\frac {\text D_\text{DHA}^2}4=\text{hacoversin}(\text D)= \frac{1-\sqrt{1-\text D^2}}2=0.16319398540839259232…$$$$\implies \int_0^{\frac {\text D_\text{DHA}^2}4} \sqrt{\frac1x-1}\,dx=\int_0^{\text I^{-1}_\frac12\left(\frac12,\frac32\right)} \sqrt{\frac1x-1}\,dx=\frac\pi4 $$

where $\text D_\text{DHA}= \sqrt{1+\text D} - \sqrt{1-\text D} = \sqrt 2\sqrt{1-\sqrt{1-\text D^2}} $ is the offset at which $2$ unit disks overlap by half of each’s area constant

Notice how the dottie number appears in the offset when a unit disk is half over another one and the median, where the areas from $0$ to the median is half of the area under the curve, of a beta distribution.

History

1 comment thread

Edit preview did not work, but the math renders in the post itself. Hmm. (5 comments)
Edit preview did not work, but the math renders in the post itself. Hmm.
Monica‭ wrote 19 days ago

Edit preview did not work, but the math renders in the post itself. Hmm.

trichoplax‭ wrote 18 days ago

I tried starting to edit this post, and the MathJax displayed correctly in the preview. I then copied the raw text and pasted it into a draft of a new answer, and the MathJax displayed correctly in the preview there too.

So everything seems to be working correctly for me on Firefox on Fedora Linux.

I've also now tested on Firefox for Android. Both previews (edit and new answer) displayed MathJax correctly.

Also works on Chromium for Fedora Linux.

Monica‭ wrote 18 days ago

Huh. I tried in the same browser but incognito (logged in as someone else) and it worked, so I guess there's some weird local state. Thanks for checking.